Editorial / Peer Review Process

To maintain a high-quality publication, all submissions undergo a rigorous review process. Papers are reviewed on the basis that they do not contain plagiarized material and have not been submitted to any other conference / journal at the same time (double submission). Manuscripts found to be plagiarized during initial stages of review are out-rightly rejected and not considered for publication in the journal.

Aksh – The Advance Journal adopts the double-blind review process of the submitted papers. The length of the review process varies between papers, and many factors affect the time it takes to review a paper. The time it takes for an associate editor to be assigned, and for available, qualified reviewers to be located depends on the complexity and the type of material submitted for review. Each publication makes a concerted effort to keep the review time to a minimum that is consistent with keeping the publication’s reputation for quality and integrity. Each submission placed into the review is sent to at least two reviewers.